Support Forum
The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts.
June
New Contributor

Fortigate 5.4.9 Routing Issue

Dear ALL,

 

I have a question about the Routing Issue.

Routing issues were detected yesterday afternoon in a firewall running on version 5.4.9 of the FortiOS.

Due to current routing issues, there were no service issues, but management access was not possible with each firewall.

 

[firewall Settings] - FortiGate3100D(5.4 Patch9) - HA : Standalone mode, Vdom : enable mgmt ip : 192.168.1.6 - FortiGate101E(5.4 Patch9) - HA : Standalone mode, Vdom : enable mgmt ip : 192.168.1.250

 

[Issue information] - management access was not possible with each firewall.

- As a result of packet capture at the firewall, the SYN packet which tried GUI Access from the administrator's PC(192.168.120.15) was confirmed. However, the firewall does not export SYN + ACK packets.

- We tested ICMP / SSH / HTTPS etc, but the result was the same.

- The target of the "exec traceroute" command of the firewall has been specified as the administrator PC. However, the output value was identified as loopback ip with "127.0.0.1".

e.g) exec trace route exec trace route 192.168.120.15

traceroute to 192.168.120.15 (192.168.120.15), 32 hops max, 3 probe packets per hot, 84 byte packes [style="background-color: #ffff00;"]1 127.0.0.1 <localhost> 2991.668 ms !H 3000.442 ms !H^C *[/style]

- The applied routing table is as follows.

e.g) config router static edit 2 set dst 192.168.120.0 255.255.255.0 set gateway 192.168.1.253 set deice mgmt1 next

- And as a result of adding host routing to the routing table, it became normal to communicate.

e.g) config route static edit 3 set dst 192.168.120.15 255.255.255.255 set gateway 192.168.1.253 set device mgmt1 next

- Also, after deleting the above "edit 3" routing, access was still possible.

- At the time of the problem, "rtcache" had the IP "192.168.1.254" instead of the Default GW IP.

 

### diagnose ip rtcache list

[style="background-color: #ffff00;"]family=02 tab=254 vf=0 type=01 tos=0 flag=00040200[/style] [style="background-color: #ffff00;"]0.0.0.0@0->192.168.120.15@4(mgmt1) gwy=192.168.1.254 prefsrc=192.168.1.6[/style] [style="background-color: #ffff00;"]ci: ref=0 lastused=274 expire=0 err=00000000 used=2 br=0 pmtu=1500[/style]

 

### get router info routing-table database

Codes: K - kernel, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area > - selected route, * - FIB route, p - stale info C *> 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, mgmt1 S *> 192.168.120.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.1.253, mgmt1

### get router info routing-table all

Codes: K - kernel, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, mgmt1 S 192.168.120.0/24 [10/0] via 192.168.1.253, mgmt1

Is the current symptom a bug?

2 REPLIES 2
June
New Contributor

Can anyone answer the current issue?

I want to know the solution to the current issue....

sw2090
Honored Contributor

could you explain your network infrastructure please?

It is quite hard to understand your problem without knowing it.

-- 

"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams

-- "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." - Douglas Adams
Labels
Top Kudoed Authors