Hello Forum, We're having a problem at a customer's site. They have 3 wan links in a volume-based SD-WAN interface on a FortiGate 101E (5.6.4). Their weights are: wan1: 50 wan2: 50 port1 (aka wan3): 0 We're not using the third wan link yet. I've configured a status check that pings 8.8.8.8 with default values. What are the objectives?
[ul]What's happening? Tough the proxy server generates almost all the traffic, almost everything seems to go only through wan2 (wan1: 1.9gb, wan2: 299.6 gb). I have a suspect, since 5.6.4 there's a "Quality criteria" option, whose possible values are: Latency, Jitter and Packet Loss (I haven't found much documentation about this). I know that wan2 is better than wan2, but I want traffic to be distributed evenly anyway. Any hints? Thanks in advance.
I forgot to add this, FWIW:
config system virtual-wan-link set status enable set load-balance-mode measured-volume-based config members edit 1 set interface "wan1" set gateway x.x.x.1 set volume-ratio 50 next edit 2 set interface "wan2" set gateway y.y.y.33 set volume-ratio 50 next edit 3 set interface "port1" set gateway z.z.z.1 next end config health-check edit "google" set server "8.8.8.8" next end config service edit 1 set name "interbanking via wan2" set member 2 set dst "interbanking" set src "all" next edit 2 set name "proxy" set mode auto set quality-link 1 set dst "all" set src "proxy" set health-check "google" next edit 3 set name "default" set member 2 set dst "all" set src "all" next end end
The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users, devices, and applications and across all network edges.
Copyright 2024 Fortinet, Inc. All Rights Reserved.