Hi FortiGate adminsAny one used the "none" interface as SD-WAN member?I
wonder if we can use it like a black hole, like when we don't want to
route some traffic through any SD-WAN members when some SD-WAN members
are down (not to fall in the implicit...
Hi FortiGate adminFrom today the recommended release has changed from
7.0.14 to
7.2.7.https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Recommended-Release-for-FortiOS/ta-p/227178
Hi FG adminsOn my FortiGate 7.2.3, freshly transferred to another
FortiCloud account successfully, when I click force update license &
signatures it doesn't work and it shows the below output.Any idea on
what can be the issue before I open a ticket?u...
Hello Fortinet teamIs this tech tip up to date? It says recommended FOS
release is still 7.0.14, while 7.0.15 is here since a week and 7.2 is
mature since two
months.https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Recommended-Release-for-Fo...
Hi FortiSwitch integratorsIf you have experience in this topic +
knowledge in both Cisco & FortiSwitch, can you enumerate the main
problems that we may encounter when we migrate Cisco core switch for
FortiSwitch? I mean in terms of capabilities and m...
If I understand well you are looking for packet capture,
right?https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.3/administration-guide/462154/using-the-packet-capture-tool
May be I missed something but I don't understand why an e-mail from a
sender that has MX 127.0.0.1 should be considered as SPAM.As far as I
know when a mail is received then DNS records like PTR, SPF and DKIM are
checked but not MX.
I wonder if it has something to do with IPv6.Can you try this?In case
your router gives you an IPv4 address, then try force it to give you an
IPv6 address onlyAnd in case your router gives you an IPv6 address then
try force it to give you an IPv4 add...