Points to ponder:1.) I have successfully established a functional IPsec
tunnel between a Fortigate 200E and a pfSense virtual machine. 2.) I
noticed that in Phase 2, if I have the Fortigate's local address set to
0.0.0.0/0 and the pfsense's remote ad...
I've set up a Site to Site IPsec tunnel between our Fortigate 200e's
here and a pfsense box. Pretty soon I will be setting up another IPsec
tunnel between our location and another location that is currently using
a Ubiquity Gateway. My boss wants me ...
I have an IPsec tunnel up and seemingly working between a Fortigate 200E
and a pfSense vm. The status on the Fortinet shows it's up, the status
on the pfSense shows that it's up and working. Shut the IPSec tunnel
off, and only if the tunnel is off, a...
I had found out the issue with Fortigate support. The agent had me run
"diag sniff packet any 'host x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y (or icmp)' 4" to see
what was happening with the packets as they left pfsense and moved
through the Fortinet. Upon closer inspecti...
I guess no one knows? All I want to know is the science behind the phase
2 address. What is the science behind using a 0.0.0.0 address versus the
specific subnet of device where all the traffic is being routed through
it (or some of it). Why Site A a...